Saturday, July 22, 2006
View From Accad
Wednesday, March 01, 2006
Matthew 9: Notes
Awhile back, this was our first insight the significance of understanding the Jewish roots of Jesus in grasping the depth of the text. There are many discussions on this. Here are two of them: RVL and 528. A strength of this story comes from the words of Malachi, "But for you who revere my name, the sun of righteousness will rise with healing in its wings. And you will go out and leap like calves released from the stall." According to RVL, this verse has messianic connotations. You can see this reflected earlier in the last words of David,
When one rules over men in righteousness,
when he rules in the fear of God, he is like the light of
morning at sunrise on a cloudless morning,
like the brightness after rain that brings the grass from the earth
Next, we noted the similarities between the end Matthew 9 and the end of Matthew 4. Jesus travels, teaches, and heals. Then in 10, he sends out his talmidim to do the exact same thing. In 3-4, the way is prepared, Jesus receives his smicha (authority), and he calls disciples. He teaches in 5-7, and puts it into practice in 8-9. His mission is captured again at the end of 9, and then he commissions his talmidim to do the same thing.
There also seem to be reflections again of Moses and the exodus. Moses sends out 12 (and 72), so does Jesus. It's also interesting to note that Moses renamed one of the spies just as Jesus renamed one of his talmidim. Moses talks about no sickness in the land if things go well (Exodus 23:25). Are the disciples "spying" out the land again, and bringing the healing and restoration to Israel and the world? Is Jesus ushering in the lasting promise land? The real kingdom of heaven?
Sunday, February 19, 2006
Genus of the name
The genus of the name, Yahweh, is that it is not a noun, it's a verb, and so you can't objectify a verb and therefore you can't make an idol out of it. It is most naturally understood in the vocative, as an address. A name is that way, as an address. The Bible has a lot of metaphors for God but Yahweh is the unique Biblical word for the Presence -- the One who is present to us and we have to be present to Him. I thought the song "Yahweh" uses the word in a way that partakes of its genius, its uniqueness. It's a personal address: "Yahweh, Yahweh." He's not talking about God, he's talking to God, or calling out to God.
Monday, January 02, 2006
Sh'ma and angels
(Thanks Lorri!)
Thursday, December 29, 2005
Why did ravens feed Elijah?
The first occurrence of the word "raven" is in the story of Noah and the flood. Genesis 8:6-8 reads:
After forty days Noah opened the window he had made in the ark and sent out a raven, and it kept flying back and forth until the water had dried up from the earth. Then he sent out a dove to see if the water had receded from the surface of the ground.So, we first hear of the raven as it is being sent out from the ark. The rabbis note that the task of searching for water is not mentioned as it is with the dove. The raven is just "sent out". In the Talmud (Tractate Sanhedrin 108b), a conversation is recorded between Noah and the raven. The raven is upset because it thinks Noah is trying to put an end to its species (only two were brought on the ark). The raven also accuses Noah of wanting to "know" the raven's wife. Noah exclaims, "You evil one!" (I can almost see this happening in Narnia!)
The rabbis teach that those who accuse someone of a blemish, have that blemish themselves (see Jesus's statement about a speck in one's eye). They say Noah deduced that the raven had had relations with its wife on the ark, an act that was strictly forbidden according to the rabbis. From this it appears Noah is evicting the raven from the ark because of bad behavior.
The rabbis then comment on the nature of Noah. According to Rashi, "Noah was a perfect man in his generation... Some of our Rabbis explain the words 'in his generation' to his discredit--he was a righteous man in his own generation, but had he been living in the generation of Abraham, he would have not been reckoned as anyone special". The comparison between Abraham and Noah continues. Both were surrounded by evil, Abraham by Sodom and Noah by a corrupt world. In both cases, God called for punishment. Abraham begged and pleaded for God to save Sodom. But Noah just accepted the judgment and did what was commanded to save his family. The rabbis conclude that Noah lacked mercy and concern for his fellow humans.
This lack of mercy is again shown in Noah evicting the raven. In a midrash, the rabbis's describe Noah as saying the raven "had no purpose" and was expendable. But God steps in with mercy and gives the raven a mission. The Torah says that the raven flew "until the water had dried up from the earth".
Enter Elijah. His first act is to stop the rain, and the earth dried up. Again the rabbis comment on character. They say there are two possible ways to win over a sinner: 1) punish them, or 2) win them over. Noah drove out the raven and Elijah punished Israel. Neither showed mercy, both were bent on punishment.
So the rabbis comment that the raven was sent to teach Elijah a lesson. The raven was seen as a cruel creature that doesn't even feed its own (see Psalm 147). If a raven fed Elijah, how much more should Elijah have "fed" the people of Israel and won them over to follow God? The lesson for Elijah continues with him traveling to Zarephath, which means "refinement". Elijah spent three years in refinement where he learned mercy and then returned to Israel to confront the evil and win over the Israelites.
A common theme echoes through these stories, "I desire mercy, not sacrifice." Everyone has worth, so do not judge.
Clearly these themes are reflected in the teachings of Jesus (for instance, see the sermon on the mount in Matthew 6-8). I also wonder if echoes of Noah and Elijah are reflected in his teachings about worry. In Luke 12 we read:
Then Jesus said to his disciples: "Therefore I tell you, do not worry about your life, what you will eat; or about your body, what you will wear. Life is more than food, and the body more than clothes. Consider the ravens: They do not sow or reap, they have no storeroom or barn; yet God feeds them. And how much more valuable you are than birds! Who of you by worrying can add a single cubit to his height? Since you cannot do this very little thing, why do you worry about the rest?The ravens turn your imagination to the flood. And so does the cubit, maybe. There was a one-cubit window in the ark. Why didn't Noah just look out the window to see if the land was dry? Was Noah just short enough that he couldn't see out the window and hence the need for the dove to look for dry land? Was he worrying about a lack of food on the ark? I wonder.
In conclusion, it seems ravens were sent to teach Elijah a lesson of mercy. If ravens could feed Elijah, how much more should he have fed Israel?
( I found a variety of sources online for this material. Two of the best summaries (which I've drawn from heavily) are from tfdixie and shemayisrael. Other interesting notes maybe worth exploring are the three years of Elijah refinement related to Jesus' three ministry years, and are there parallels between the widow at Zarepheth and the woman at the well in John?)
Saturday, December 17, 2005
Same material
Do not judge so that you will not be judged. For in the way you judge, you will be judged; and by your standard of measure, it will be measured to you. Why do you look at the speck that is in your brother's eye, but do not notice the log that is in your own eye? Or how can you say to your brother, 'Let me take the speck out of your eye,' and behold, the log is in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your brother's eye.Her insight was that the speck and log (or plank in the NIV) are made of the same material. The same material, the same sin. How often are we so sensitive to the small speck of a particular sin in someone's life when there is a glaring plank of that particular sin in our own life? Thanks Michelle.
...wrd...
Sunshine, come and help me sing
My heart is darker than these oceans
My heart is frozen underneath
We are crooked souls trying to stay up straight,
Dry eyes in the pouring rain well
The shadow proves the sunshine
The shadow proves the sunshine
To scared that I'll run always
Hold fast to the break of day light where
The shadow proves the sunshine
Oh Lord, why did you forsake me?
Oh Lord, don't be far away
Storm clouds gathering beside me
Please Lord, don't look the other way
Shine on me,
the shadow proves the sunshine
Sunday, September 18, 2005
Brother, where art thou?
He begins by asking an unfair question in his mind. "What kind of parent is God when he doesn't accept his child's gift? If your two children brought you a picture each had drawn, would you as a parent say little Debbie's picture was so much better than little Bobby's? Is the Cain and Abel story different some how?" It reminds me of a story RVL tells.
A friend of his walked into a photographer's shop in Safed. "Which picture is your favorite?" she asked. He said, "Are you married?" She said, "Yes, why?". "Do you have children?" "Yes, why?" "Which one is your favorite?"We all love our children in a unique way. How could God reject not only the gift of his child but also the child himself? "But on Cain and his offering he did not look with favor".
In part II, Rabbi Fohrman says the fallacy in this question is the comparison. With your two children's pictures, you don't compare relative value. Each picture has value in and of itself without an external standard apart from the author. The text clearly states that Abel brought the best of his flock, while Cain just brought something. It's very interesting to note though that Cain brought his offering first! He was the first to offer a gift. And it wasn't his best. Why? For insight into this, the rabbi encourages us to look at the context of the story. Why does the Cain and Abel story appear in this section of the text? (Go do this before continuing...very interesting it is.)
In part III, Rabbi Fohrman highlights the similarities between eating the forbidden fruit and the murder of Abel. God asks "Where are you?". He uses the word "ayeh" for "where" which says something more like "Why are you not here, what is wrong?" In both stories fear is expressed when God arrives. Both Adam and Cain suffer exile. Both will experience difficult farming. But there is a growing intensity with Cain. The results are much more severe. Somehow, the text is connecting the questions faced by Cain--"What offering should I bring?" and "Should I take my brother for a walk in the field?"--back to the garden.
In light of Jesus, I can't help but think of the sermon on the mount and his discussion about murder:
"Therefore, if you are offering your gift at the altar and there remember that your brother has something against you, 24leave your gift there in front of the altar. First go and be reconciled to your brother; then come and offer your gift."Is there background to the story we don't have? God seems to think so when he tells Cain to "master it", that is the sin that is crouching at his door. Is Jesus is referring to this text? Did Abel have something against Cain? Should Cain have reconciled himself with Abel before coming to God?
Another thing I find strange is the meaning of "Abel". In Hebrew it is pronounced "Hevel" and according to Strong's Dictionary means "vain". I would have expected it to mean something like "pure" or "innocent". Is Abel's name signifcant here?
Saturday, September 17, 2005
Big Yellow Wisdom
'Friends stay friends
by the little things
they do for each other.'
Thanks for my nest, Pals.
The next hurricane I'll help you.
Thank you, thank you,
thank you for being my friends."
I wonder if his Granny had been reading Proverbs regularly?
and families stick together in all kinds of trouble.
Proverbs 17:17 (The Message)
Thursday, August 18, 2005
...lbc...
O come and mourn with me awhile
O come near to the Savior's side
O come together, let us mourn
O love of God, O sin of man
In this dread act your strength is tried
And victory remains with love
A broken heart, a fount of tears
Ask and they will not be denied
A broken heart love's cradle is
And victory remains with love
O come and mourn with me awhile
Wednesday, August 10, 2005
Pool of Siloam
(Thanks for the pointer Mike. Also, I archived the LA story and picture here and here and BAR here.)
Sunday, July 31, 2005
Desert Temptations - Part 5
We've been discussing Jesus' temptations in the desert. They seem to be fundamental to his work here and to Israel as a whole. They seem to reflect the temptations that Israel faced in their exodus from Egypt. The importance of this event took root in our hearts when we looked at the writings of Jesus' three closest talmidim, Peter, James, and John.
Peter talks about trials and temptations often in his first letter. Consider I Peter 5:8-9:
8Be self-controlled and alert. Your enemy the devil prowls around like a roaring lion looking for someone to devour. 9Resist him, standing firm in the faith, because you know that your brothers throughout the world are undergoing the same kind of sufferings.Was Peter equating the evil one to the lion that will be trampled in Psalm 91? Peter definitely points us in these verses to Jesus' temptations and how He overcame them.
Who can forget how James begins his epistle (James 1:2-4)?
Consider it pure joy, my brothers, whenever you face trials of many kinds, 3because you know that the testing of your faith develops perseverance. 4Perseverance must finish its work so that you may be mature and complete, not lacking anything.I have yet to consider temptations as "pure joy" but maybe Jesus did after he came through them. Maybe that is a key to getting through them and growing during the process. Sounds brutal.
Look at James 1:13-15:
13When tempted, no one should say, "God is tempting me." For God cannot be tempted by evil, nor does he tempt anyone; 14but each one is tempted when, by his own evil desire, he is dragged away and enticed. 15Then, after desire has conceived, it gives birth to sin; and sin, when it is full-grown, gives birth to death.He describes a three part process to temptation and sin: conception, birth, and death. Three parts of Jesus' temptation are highlighted in Matthew. Are these related?
And then John, in his first letter, says it profoundly:
16For everything in the world—the cravings of sinful man, the lust of his eyes and the boasting of what he has and does—comes not from the Father but from the world. 17The world and its desires pass away, but the man who does the will of God lives forever.Again, three parts to sin: the lust of the flesh, the eyes, and the pride of life (see the KJV and the 77's). These are reflected in Matthew's recollection of Jesus' temptations.
We wondered if this process played out with Eve, with Samson, with David, with others and with us. And then we finally moved on to the beginning of Jesus' ministry in the rest of Matthew chapter 4.
Sunday, June 26, 2005
Desert Temptations - Part 4
We also discussed a theme brought up by Eric that centered on the questions, "Did Jesus know all along that he was Messiah and his ultimate work was the cross and resurrection? Or was it a gradual process that was revealed to him since he kept his divine nature in check?" We find in Luke that at the age of twelve, Jesus referred to God has "my Father" which indicates he knew he had a special relationship. He's baptized by John in Matthew 3, heaven is ripped open with a dove descending, and Jesus must see he has a special calling. The temptations seem to suggest that in his humanity, Jesus is coming to realize the full extent of what it means to be Messiah.
First, he's tempted with a fleshy need. "Hey, I'm chosen. And I seem to have special gifts. Can't I just use them to help me out? I am REALLY hungry. It would be so easy. Look at all these stones. Just a snap and poof. Bread!" If we may, we felt it was like Bruce Almighty. Once he realized who he had become, he worried about his own desires. The red sea parted in his soup, his jalopy became a Saleen, and his girl friend, well, never mind.
Second, it's about privelege. "Well, hey, I'm chosen. I'm special. I can do whatever I want and God will protect. How many times does he promise to protect me? Let's just have a little fun. Plus, it's been awhile since I've seen angels." Can anyone think of any similar situations?
Third, "Hey, now, I have power, true power. I can feed my armies and raise them when they die. All of this could be mine. And I wouldn't have to get hurt." If we may, we felt it was like Anakin in Episode III. He was surrounded by volcanoes, burdened by war and pain, masterfully manipulated by a liar, and caught between his love and his mentor. And all he wanted was peace and life, but in his own way, through his own might, and he would kill to get it.
And Jesus stood his ground. He humbled himself and trusted in God through His promises. He quoted from two consecutive portions of the Torah. In Hebrew, these portions are called "parashahs" and the two from which Jesus quoted are called Va'etchanan (which means "I pleaded") and 'Ekev (which means "because"). At the end of each parashah, the last few verses are called the maftir and summarize the portion. Listen to the maftirs of Va'etchanan and 'Ekev.
The maftir of Va'etchanan (Deut. 7:9-11):More to follow.
9 Know therefore that the LORD your God is God; he is the faithful God, keeping his covenant of love to a thousand generations of those who love him and keep his commands. 10 But those who hate him he will repay to their face by destruction; he will not be slow to repay to their face those who hate him. 11 Therefore, take care to follow the commands, decrees and laws I give you today.
The maftir of 'Ekev (Deut. 11:22-25):
22 If you carefully observe all these commands I am giving you to follow—to love the LORD your God, to walk in all his ways and to hold fast to him- 23 then the LORD will drive out all these nations before you, and you will dispossess nations larger and stronger than you. 24 Every place where you set your foot will be yours: Your territory will extend from the desert to Lebanon, and from the Euphrates River to the western sea. [a] 25 No man will be able to stand against you. The LORD your God, as he promised you, will put the terror and fear of you on the whole land, wherever you go.
Desert Temptations - Part 3
During the second temptation, the tempter takes Jesus to the highest spot of the temple and says something like, "So, you're the Son God. Throw yourself down since it is written,
'For he will command his angels concerning youWe read through Psalm 91, the psalm the tempter is quoting. Why did the tempter pick this verse? Did Jesus key in on "trust" in verse 2 and gain confidence knowing that if trusted, and not tested, God would be his "fortress"? Did he gain strength from verse 13 where if he trusted, "young lions and serpents you will trample underfoot." The serpent image took us back to the garden, the temptations there, and the promise that the snake would have his head crushed. Did he picture Adam and Eve and know this time he could prevail with the help of God? (The lion image bothered us abit since we thought of the lion of Judah but by the end of the night we found other verses that made this work quite beautifully. We'll describe later.)
to guard you in all your ways;
they will lift you up in their hands,
so that you will not strike your foot against a stone.'"
Maybe fear stole into Jesus' heart when he thought of verse 16, "I will satisfy him with long life and show him salvation." Standing at the "highest point", he might have been on the corner of the temple where the shofar is blown to announce the offerings. In his humanity, did Jesus know that years from now, at 3pm, the shofar would sound and he would breath his last on the cross? (I have more on thoughts on this here.)
Maybe the "long life" verse brought him to another scripture, "...so that you may enjoy long life. Hear, O Israel". Shema! Hear! Hear, O Israel. Yes, the Lord is our God, the Lord is one! And maybe his mind raced through that section of Deuteronomy to verse 16, "Do not test the Lord your God as you did at Massah."
What happened at Massah? Israel was on their way to Sinai from Egypt, being led again by the Spirit, and they quarreled. "Give us water", they cried out! "Is the Lord among us or not?" In the heat (day), in the cold (night), in the desert they doubted and they quarreled. God of course provided, but the people did not trust. Would Jesus succeed and place his trust in God?
(Disclaimer, take this paragraph with a grain of salt since I'm not a linguist and don't read Hebrew yet).
Moses named the place Massah after this event. Originally, it was called Rephidim, which is the masculine form of rphiydah, which means "balusters" according to Strong's Dictionary. The Israelites are in a place called the "balusters", or the place of railings. Did Jesus grab this "railing" when he looked over the edge of the highest point? Did this "railing" of God's Word save him?
Ginger pointed out the story following Massah. Maybe Jesus remembered what happened next, the battle with the Amalekites. Joshua fought against them and was victorious as Aaron and Hur "lifted up" Moses hands. God would lift up Jesus, but in His time. Did Jesus picture the crucifixion again, but this time sense victory? Did he glimpse that he too would be lifted up as Moses lifted up the snake so that God's love could be shown for the whole world?
And Jesus responds, "Do not test the Lord your God."
More to follow.
Saturday, June 25, 2005
Desert Temptations - Part 2
Did Jesus look down at the stones to which the tempter was pointing? Considering the desert is covered in stones (I'll post pictures once my server is back up), he must have seen stones all over the ground. Stones covering the ground. Covering the ground. "When the dew was gone, thin flakes like frost on the ground appeared on the desert floor." Manna came from heaven because the Israelites grumbled and did not trust God to provide. They tested Him and asked to be fed immediately. Did Jesus picture the stones as manna on the desert floor?
Jesus' response in Matthew is, "Man does not live on bread alone but on every word that comes from the mouth of God." The beginning of the verse that Jesus is quoting reads, "He humbled you, causing you to hunger, and then feeding you with manna." Did the stones all over the desert floor remind Jesus of manna? Did he picture it? Did he then remember this verse about manna and living on every word from God? Surely his stomach was grumbling, just like the Israelites. But he didn't voice his complaint. He didn't grumble. He was being led by the Spirit and he trusted. Jesus tamed his tongue, and he did not speak to turn these stones to bread. We found this train of thought so encouraging because it shows us how we can resist and the temptation will flee.
Lily's awake. More to follow.
Desert Temptations - Part 1
The first question was asked by Michelle, "Does the tempter really have the authority to give away the kingdoms? Who gave it to him?" We noted that Jesus refers to the "prince of this world" but didn't go much further with this.
We spent most of the evening wrestling with the significance of the three temptations. The gospel according to Luke seems to stress that Jesus was tempted for forty days. Surely he was tempted more than three times, so why are these three mentioned?
We discussed the similarities with the beginning of Matthew and the Exodus of Israel as recorded in the books of Genesis, Exodus, and Deuteronomy. We noted the following:
- In Genesis, a man named Joseph (who was the son of Jacob, the great grandson of Abraham, and ruler of Egypt) took Israel to Egypt to escape hardship (famine). In Matthew, a father named Joseph (also the son of a Jacob according to Matthew), took Jesus and his mother to escape hardship (murder by Herod).
- In Exodus, the Israelites were then immersed in the Red Sea (Sea of Reeds) after they left Jesus. In Matthew, Jesus is immersed in the Jordan by John.
- In Exodus, the Israelites were then led by the spirit of God into the desert (with a pillar of fire and a pillar of smoke, two pillars--like the strong legs of a shepherd). Likewise, in Matthew, Jesus is led by the spirit into the desert.
- In Exodus, Israel spent about forty days getting to Sinai. In the Gospels, Jesus spent forty days in the desert. (We also wondered when Jesus entered the desert. Wouldn't it be something if he left right after Passover? Just like Israel?)
More to follow.
Tuesday, June 07, 2005
Simcha
Friday, May 20, 2005
Rock Connection?
1For I do not want you to be ignorant of the fact, brothers, that our forefathers were all under the cloud and that they all passed through the sea. 2They were all baptized into Moses in the cloud and in the sea. 3They all ate the same spiritual food 4and drank the same spiritual drink; for they drank from the spiritual rock that accompanied them, and that rock was Christ. 5Nevertheless, God was not pleased with most of them; their bodies were scattered over the desert.Moses struck a rock (he should have just spoken), water came out, and Israel was being established. Jesus is at a place where water is coming out of a rock and speaks of establishing his movement. Also, at some point he speaks of streams of living water flowing from a person. Paul, in 1 Corinthians, calls Jesus the rock from which water flowed. Paul is reminding us of the Exodus. Is Jesus as well? Is Paul referring to the Philippi event too? These seem to be some interesting connections to ponder.
Monday, May 16, 2005
Foolish wisdom
This week I was reading Paul's first letter to the Corinthians where he discusses wisdom. He has strong words about the relying on one's personal wisdom. "Adonai knows that the thoughts of the wise are worthless." These verses could explain parts of the anti-intellectualism that Thomas Frank discusses in "What's the Matter With Kansas". I haven't read it yet but a friend brought it to my attention. Do we blindly accept what we are taught, or what we read from particular texts?
I am not sure this is what Paul intended. Paul mentions the enrichment by God's love in Corinth as evident by their power of speech and depth of knowledge (I Cor 1:4-7). So, studying and knowledge are seen as good gifts. Also, Paul was a zealous rabbi who studied under Gamaliel (one of the greatest first century rabbis). Paul was clearly proud of his credentials. Do you know the amount of study it takes to be a talmid of Gamaliel? Paul likely had the Tanakh memorized. How much study did that take?!
Paul's discussion about wisdom is held in parentheses by a discussion of unity, and the following of one teacher over another. The Corinthian church had been fractured into those who followed different leaders (sound familiar?). This then must be central to his thoughts on wisdom. Does our wisdom puff us up and divide our communities? Or does it unite us in a common purpose? This brings us to the question then, what is wisdom? A topic for later.
Wisdom, her sweet voice is in the street. Love her and she will watch over you. Where does it begin? Reverence on a moon lit night. A shiver when diving in the rain, she'll explain. A smile like salvation. All I want is your face in a locket, a picture in my pocket.
Wednesday, May 04, 2005
On the side again?
I am alarmed today after reading Nicholas Kristof's editorial in the NY Times on May 3, 2005 concerning your request to delete provisions about Darfur from current legislation. As you rightly named the tragedy there as genocide, so other agencies are reporting hundreds of thousands of dead due to ethnic violence. Can we stand by on the side again as innocents are slaughtered?
As a person of faith, I respect your fight for life issues such as unborn children and Terry Shiavo. Concerning Terry, you called for us to "build a culture of life, where all Americans are welcomed and valued and protected, especially those who live at the mercy of others." Does this not apply also to the innocent in Sudan? My heart breaks when I hear of the genocide in Sudan. I personally am limited in what I can do, but this great country, led by you, has the opportunity to save hundreds of thousands of lives.
Please be consistent in your culture of life. You have an opportunity to lead in the world in saving, feeding, clothing, and hundreds of the "least of these". Please act on our behalf. For me and my family, this is far more important than the price of gas or social security.
Thank you for your time.
--James